1923 is sitting around #9 to #10 positions on the streamer, across Latin America, including Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, El Salvador, Uruguay, and Venezuela. During the last week alone, the average placement holds in the mid-to-high nines. That bottom-of-the-Top-10 grip matters because it points to steady discovery across multiple territories, not a single market’s binge spike.

That’s an intriguing turn for the franchise’s most polarizing detour. Instead of Yellowstone’s modern ranch power games, 1923 plays harsher and slower, and splits its attention between frontier survival and a broader historical lens that asks for patience before the payoff. But the fundamentals are hard to dismiss: the prequel, which launched in 2022, is led by Harrison Ford and Helen Mirren, and currently has an 8.3/10 IMDb score alongside a 92% Rotten Tomatoes rating.

What Makes ‘1923’ Polarizing As Compared to ‘1883’

1883, the sequel to Yellowstone, plays like one relentless, linear migration with Elsa Dutton’s (Isabel May) narration stitching everything together, so even when it gets savage (river crossings, illness, raids, the trail’s constant attrition), it still feels like a single emotional thesis: what it costs to get land.